Legal Opinion

Gwynn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1987No. WCB 84-11354; CA A38534; SC S33828PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

The issue is whether an award of compensation for permanent partial disability that is based in part on a prediction that from time to time “future symptomatic flareups” will occur precludes an award of compensation under ORS 656.273(1) for such flareups even if they produce greater disability than that for which the original award was made. We hold that it does not.

Claimant, who had received a workers’ compensation award for unscheduled permanent partial disability, filed a claim under ORS 656.273 with respondent State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF). SAIF denied the claim. On judicial review…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Harwell v. Argonaut InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Gwynn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Perry v. SAIF CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. SAIF Corp. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Gwynn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. International Paper Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API