Legal Opinion

Young v. Peterson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1987No. TC 86-C-10444; CA A43676; SC S34494PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

An appeal from a final judgment in this post-conviction case was dismissed by the Court of Appeals on March 17, 1987, for failure to file a timely notice of appeal. Approximately a week later, a document entitled “Amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment” was entered. A notice of appeal was filed subsequent to the “amended” judgment and the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the post-conviction court.

Timely filing of the notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement for an appeal. ORS 19.033(2)(b). We previously have stated:

“* * * If the amendment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Clatsop Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. FentonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Krajacic v. Blazing OrchardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. DahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Avalos v. BowyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API