Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Cincinnati
Hamilton County Probate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDavies, J.
This matter came before the court upon the demurrer of the defendant, the City of Cincinnati, to the petition of the plaintiff, The Cincinnati and Suburban Bell Telephone Company.
In its petition the plaintiff alleges that it is a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of Ohio; that it is engaged in the telephone business and part of its operations is in Hamilton County, Ohio; that it operates its business by the use, among other things, of poles, wires, circuits, cables, conduits, and other similar equipment; that for a number of years it has owned and used in the operation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wachendorf v. ShaverOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Olds v. KlotzOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Niehaus v. State Ex Rel. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Cincinnati v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Waikiki Resort Hotel, Inc. v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- City of Perrysburg v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Automatic Refreshment Service, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Mentor v. Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024