Legal Opinion
Olds v. Klotz
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1936No. 25907PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
In the case of Wilson v. City of Zanesville, 130 Ohio St., 286, 199 N. E., 187, this court upheld the validity of a municipal ordinance of the city of Zanesville, which required the closing of barber shops before eight o’clock a. m. and after six o’clock p. m. on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday, before eight o’clock a. m. and after twelve o’clock noon on Thursday, and before eight o ’clock a. m. and after eight o’clock p. m. on Saturday and days (other than Sunday) prior to certain named holidays, upon the theory that the ordinance was not unreasonable, had a real and substantial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Fenner v. BoykinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Direct Plumbing Supply Co. v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Wymsylo v. Bartec, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
- Anderson v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Greater Fremont, Inc. v. City of FremontDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.