Legal Opinion
City of Perrysburg v. Toledo Edison Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 23, 2007No. WD-06-035PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Singer, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellant, the Toledo Edison Company, appeals a judgment from the Wood County Court of Common Pleas, granting declaratory judgment to appellee, the city of Perrysburg. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.
{¶ 2} In 2003, the city of Perrysburg sought to widen the intersection of State Route 25 and Roachton Road to accommodate the construction of a new high school. To complete the project, it was necessary to relocate electrical poles and equipment belonging to the Toledo Edison Company that were partially located…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Lorain National Bank v. Saratoga ApartmentsOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re Complaint of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SouthernOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. LeslieOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Skaff v. KhutorskyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.