Legal Opinion

Automatic Refreshment Service, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1993No. C-920652PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marianna Brown Bettman, Judge.

This case asks this court to determine whether the city of Cincinnati ordinance which enacted Chapter 849 of the Cincinnati Municipal Code (“Chapter 849”) to prohibit the vending-machine distribution of tobacco products (“vending of tobacco products”) in public places and to place strict limits on the vending of tobacco products in certain liquor-permit premises is in conflict with R.C. 2927.02 (“the state law”), which covers the illegal distribution of cigarettes and other tobacco products throughout the state. For the reasons which follow we find that Chapter…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. SesansteinOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Flury v. Central Publishing House of Reformed Church in the United StatesOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Village of West Jefferson v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Garcia v. Siffrin Residential Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Ohio Ass'n of Private Detective Agencies, Inc. v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Fairview Park v. Barefoot Grass Lawn Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. City of Perrysburg v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Viola Park v. City of Pickerington, 2006 Ca 00017 (6-6-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. City of Fairview Park v. Barefoot Grass Lawn Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. FAM 13375, Inc. v. Brook ParkOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API