Legal Opinion
Central Maine Power Co. v. Waterville Urban Renewal Authority
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided September 9, 1971PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFRESNE, Chief Justice.
The instant case is before us on report. This Court is asked to render such decision as the rights of the parties require based upon the complaint, answer, an agreed statement of facts and on so much of the evidence presented to the Court below, including testimony and exhibits, as is legally admissible. 4 M.R.S.A. § 57, M.R.C.P., Rule 72(a), (b).
The defendant, Waterville Urban Renewal Authority, hereinafter termed the Authority, under the provisions of 30 M. R.S.A. §§ 4801 et seq., recommended for approval to the municipal officers of the City of Waterville the Urban…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Selectmen of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Hollon v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Olson v. RothwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- STATE EX REL. COSM. ETC. v. BrunoWashington Supreme Court · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Seven Islands Land Co. v. Maine Land Use Regulation CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Environmental Improvement CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Driscoll v. GheewallaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Tisei v. Town of OgunquitSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Frank v. Assessors of SkowheganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.