Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1925No. 18564, 18565, 18566PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

These cases will be considered here, as they were in, the courts below, upon the single question whether the state, having entered the field of levying an excise tax by the provisions of Section 5483, Section 5485 and Section 5486, General Code, thereby pre-empted the field for the purpose of levying an excise tax on the particular classes of occupation therein named, to the exclusion of the municipality upon the same subject.

Section 5483, General Code, provides:

“In the month of October, annually, the auditor of state shall charge, for collection from each * * * telephone * * * company, a sum…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foundry Co. v. LandesOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Ramey v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Haefner v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Athens v. McClain (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API