Happel v. Happel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Coupled with the motion for a new trial was a motion to amend and change the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The action is one to have a tract of land consisting of nine lots in the village of Houston decreed to be owned by and the title and right to possession thereof vested in plaintiff. Plaintiff is a son of W. H. Happed, deceased, and defendants ai*e his three brothers and their wives, two of the brothers being the executors of the father’s estate. Plaintiff claims he is the owner of the property by reason…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. HoagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Colby v. StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Morrow v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Chapel v. ChapelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Simonson v. MoseleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Ehmke v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Matheson v. GullicksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Mosloski v. GambleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Hanson v. BowmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.