Legal Opinion

Brown v. Hoag

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1886PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, Koon, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Action of ejectment. Both parties claim title through Anna Hoag. The paper title of plaintiff consisted of (1) a warranty deed from Anna Hoag to Fred. Hoag, dated October 30, 1883, and recorded November 7, 1883; (2) a warranty deed from Fred. Hoag to plaintiff, dated January 3, 1884, and recorded January 7, 1884. The paper title of defendant consisted of (1) a contract to sell and convey (Exhibit A) from Anna Hoag to defendant, dated November 20, 1881, but never recorded; (2) a warranty deed from Anna Hoag to defendant, dated May 31, 1883, recorded April 17, 1884. All these conveyances, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Baldwin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Crosby v. Estate of StrahanWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Wall v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Ehmke v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API