Legal Opinion

Mosloski v. Gamble

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 9, 1934No. 29,745PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 253 N.W. 378. Actions to enforce the provisions of mutual wills made March 4, 1913, by John Mosloski and Kate Mosloski, his wife, the parents of plaintiff, in which he was a beneficiary. There were findings for plaintiff, and the defendant, A.W. Gamble, as administrator of the estate of John Mosloski, appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Mutual wills are those in which the testators make mutual or reciprocal bequests or devises in favor of the other. They may be in one instrument or in as many as there are testators. A joint will may be mutual and reciprocal…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Edson v. . ParsonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Rastetter v. . HoenningerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Frazier v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Carmichael v. CarmichaelMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Baker v. SyfrittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. ImmeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Maurer v. JohanssonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  3. Estate of Vermilya v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  4. Jannetta v. JannettaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. In Re Estate of LeboriusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API