Legal Opinion

Melosevich v. Cichy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1948No. 30301PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was commenced by George Mel-osevich and wife against Bernice Rhodes, as executrix of the last will and testament of Tim P. Kelly, deceased, and Joseph Schoen, W. W. Cichy, and Mrs. Jack O’Conner, doing business as the Royal Amusement Company, a copartnership, doing business as the Royal Amusement Company in Thurston county, in the city of Olympia, under the firm name and style of Tim Kelly Amusement Company, to recover damages for personal injuries received by plaintiffs, and property damages resulting from a collision between a car driven by Tim Kelly and one owned by plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carlson v. P. F. Collier & Son Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Rice v. GarlWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Swanson v. Webb Tractor & Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Iron v. SauveWashington Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mading v. McPhadenWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Marszalk v. Van VolkenburgCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. Hallett v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. Herr v. BrakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Marszalk v. Van VolkenburgCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API