Legal Opinion

Mading v. McPhaden

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1957No. 33689PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This suit was brought to recover $12,500 from two copartners. The complaint alleged that in August, 1953, plaintiff purchased a certain building in Seattle; that one of the defendant partners, Robert D. McPhaden, acted as plaintiff’s agent in arranging the purchase of the property and made a secret profit of $5,000; and that the partnership had loaned plaintiff $60,000, for which they charged him a $7,500 “premium” in addition to interest at the rate of six per cent. The prayer asked judgment against both partners, and their respective marital communities, in the full amount of $12,500,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Donaldson v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Keisel v. BredickWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Turnbull v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Arneman v. ArnemanWashington Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. LaHue v. Keystone Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  2. Nuttall v. DowellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  3. Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Douglas Reservoirs Water Users Ass'n v. Maurer & GarstWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Ransom v. HanerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API