Hallett v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Dissent
Ringold, J.*
(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent from the majority. The majority misperceives the issue by stating, "The principal issue in this appeal is whether the St. Paul policy provides coverage for Willhite's individual liability." Willhite's tortious conduct is not in issue, but the question before us is whether the accident occurred while Willhite was furthering the affairs of the partnership.
Partnership Liability
A partnership is considered an aggregate of the partners rather than a separate legal entity, Vasey v. Snohomish Cy., 44 Wn. App. 83, 91, 721 P.2d 524 (1986) (quoting with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bortle v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Daves v. NastosWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BirchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Draper MacHine Works, Inc. v. HagbergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Vasey v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.