Legal Opinion

Iron v. Sauve

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1947No. 30057PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Appellants sue to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Helen Iron, Iola Iron, and Gertrude Bullingsight, who were injured when the truck of respondents Mr. and Mrs. Virgil Sauve, hereinafter referred to as respondents Sauve, on which they were riding, was involved in a collision with an automobile driven by the defendant Oliver Halterman. Respondent S. E. Chaffee, hereinafter referred to as respondent Chaffee, was joined as a party defendant on the basis of an allegation in the amended complaint that Halterman and Chaffee. . were engaged in a joint venture under which they were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Nonn v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Caswell v. Maplewood GarageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  4. Fuller v. TuckerWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Tarlecka v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. HarmsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Golberg v. SanglierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Sullivan v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Nogosek v. TruednerWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Melosevich v. CichyWashington Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API