In Re Trigg
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Justice.
This appeal presents the question whether the courts have jurisdiction to grant relief to a taxpayer because his grazing land has been improperly classified and consequently assessed at a valuation so excessive as to be constructively' fraudulent. This question must be answered in the af- ' firmative. See In re Blatt, 41 N.M. 269, 67 P.2d 293, 110 A.L.R. 656; Scholle v. State Tax Comm., 42 N.M. 371, 78 P.2d 1116.
These decisions introduce no new principles. In First National Bank of Raton v. McBride, 20 N.M. 381, 149 P. 353, 357, it was said: “There inheres in the nature of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burg v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Lubbock Hotel Co. v. Lubbock Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Scudder v. HartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Simkins v. City of CorsicanaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- State v. BlattNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Barber's Super Markets, Inc. v. StrykerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Skinner v. New Mexico State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Romero v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Pillsbury v. BlumenthalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.