Legal Opinion
Barber's Super Markets, Inc. v. Stryker
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1972No. 763PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Barber’s Super Markets, Inc., in Count I, sought damages arising out of an alleged conspiracy to defraud and breach of fiduciary duties by defendants. In Count II, Barber’s sought damages in the alternative against Stryker for violation of fiduciary duties and for negligence, all in connection with the sale to Barber’s of an 18 acre tract of. land in Las Cruces, New Mexico, hereinafter called the Chisholm tract.
At the close of Barber’s evidence, the trial court held that Barber’s was not entitled to jury trial on Count I. It assumed jurisdiction as trier of the facts.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Knauss v. Gottfried Krueger Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- State Trust & Savings Bank v. Hermosa Land & Cattle Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
- Iriart v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Scudder v. HartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Catherine B. Ramsey v. Charles H. Culpepper and the Farmington Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Reeves v. WimberlyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Las Luminarias of the New Mexico Council of the Blind v. IsengardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Robison v. KatzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of FerrillNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.