Legal Opinion
Romero v. Sanchez
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1971No. 9237PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
Appellants (“plaintiffs”) brought this action to set aside a deed executed by them to appellees (“defendants”) on the grounds of fraud, and for damages. Defendants successfully moved for summary judgment and plaintiffs appealed. We reverse. ,:
The complaint alleged that plaintiffs were the owners of certain land in Valencia County which defendants, on March 2, 1953, agreed to purchase for $10,000.00, payable $200.00 per month; that defendants went into possession and have paid a total of $400.00.
The first question presented is whether the allegations of fraud are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Armstrong v. AshleySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Arias v. SpringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Western Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Taylor v. Hanchett Oil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Catherine B. Ramsey v. Charles H. Culpepper and the Farmington Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Williams v. StewartNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Maxey v. QuintanaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Aurora Credit Services, Inc. v. Liberty West Development, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
- Sierra Blanca Sales Co., Inc. v. Newco Industries, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.