Pillsbury v. Blumenthal
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Justice.: Appellees, plaintiffs below, instituted this action for damages for breach of contract. The complaint charges that appellants failed to properly complete the construction of a residence according to the terms of the contract. Issue was joined by general denial and the following special defenses were asserted: (a) the complaint failed to. state a claim , upon which relief could be granted; (b) that arbitration was a condition precedent to any right of action; (c) acceptance of the work by appellees constituted a waiver; and (d) appellees’ failure to mitigate the damages.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Burg v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- In Re Morrow's WillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Michelet v. ColeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re TriggNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Las Luminarias of the New Mexico Council of the Blind v. IsengardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Camino Real Mobile Home Park Partnership v. WolfeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Municipio de Mayagüez v. LebrónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2006
- R.A. Peck, Inc. v. Liberty Federal Savings BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.