Legal Opinion

Pillsbury v. Blumenthal

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1954No. 5756PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.: Appellees, plaintiffs below, instituted this action for damages for breach of contract. The complaint charges that appellants failed to properly complete the construction of a residence according to the terms of the contract. Issue was joined by general denial and the following special defenses were asserted: (a) the complaint failed to. state a claim , upon which relief could be granted; (b) that arbitration was a condition precedent to any right of action; (c) acceptance of the work by appellees constituted a waiver; and (d) appellees’ failure to mitigate the damages.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Burg v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  3. In Re Morrow's WillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Michelet v. ColeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  5. In Re TriggNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Las Luminarias of the New Mexico Council of the Blind v. IsengardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Camino Real Mobile Home Park Partnership v. WolfeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Municipio de Mayagüez v. LebrónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2006
  5. R.A. Peck, Inc. v. Liberty Federal Savings BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API