Legal Opinion

Scudder v. Hart

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1941No. 4585PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

This case involves the validity of a tax deed.

Drake (who is not a party to this suit) was the owner of- the land involved herein. In order to secure an obligation to Prendergast (appellant), he conveyed said land by warranty deed with an agreement for reconveyance when the debt was paid. Drake and Prendergast will hereafter occasionally be referred to as the owner and mortgagee respectively. In the fall of 1938, the mortgagee notified' the owner that he needed money, and unless the owner could arrange to pay it he would have to sell the property, whereupon the owner…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hermann v. Niagara Fire InsururanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Pace v. WightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Lefferts v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Slater v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  5. Lane v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Barber's Super Markets, Inc. v. StrykerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Kershner v. SganziniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Velasquez v. MascarenasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State Ex Rel. State Tax Commission v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. In Re TriggNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API