Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Burg v. City of Albuquerque
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1926No. 2861PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT
BRICE, District Judge
(after'stating the facts as above). 1. The first assignment of error sufficiently raises the question of whether or not the court erred in dismissing the case upon the grounds stated in the order of dismissal. It was not necessary for the relator to take any exception to the action of the court in dismissing said cause; for, if the court erred by such action, its judgment was inherently and fatally defective, appearing upon the face of the record proper, and may be contested by w^rit of error or appeal without an exception. Baca v. Perea, 25 N. M. 442,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Boyd v. Nebraska Ex Rel. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Attorney General v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- State v. LordOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. State ex rel. MayorSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Lyons v. Lederle LaboratoriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Laret Investment Co. v. DickmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Mitchell v. AllisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Mendoza v. Small Claims Court of Los Angeles Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Castillo Corp. v. New Mexico State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.