Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance Company v. Austin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 19, 1969No. 44632PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

One of the standard policy provisions having reference to the collision insurance provides that “upon payment . . . Allstate shall succeed to all the insured’s rights of recovery therefor, and the insured shall do whatever is necessary to secure such rights and do nothing after loss to prejudice them.” The satisfaction of Austin’s judgment was, of course, a complete settlement of his cause of action against the tortfeasor and was such an act as would make impossible any subsequent assignment of a claim for property damages to Allstate or collection by Allstate. It is stated in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Powers v. CALVERT FIRE INS. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  2. Gregory v. SchnursteinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Universal Credit Co. v. Service Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  4. Poynter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Ricker v. BrancaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Phillips v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Carter v. BanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Five Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Sexton v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Unigard Insurance v. Zimmerman's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API