Legal Opinion
Ricker v. Brancale
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 5, 1966No. 41776PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Presiding Judge.
1. “As against general demurrer, the general allegation of agency of one of the defendants for the other is sufficient.” Williams v. Ballenger, 87 Ga. App. 255 (2) (73 SE2d 509).(a) “In an action founded upon negligence, mere general averments of negligence are sufficient against general demurrer. Hudgins v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 122 Ga. 695 (50 SE 974).” Harvey v. Zell, 87 Ga. App. 280, 284 (73 SE2d 605).(b) Assuming but not deciding that the plaintiff’s petition as originally filed was subject to special demurrer it was not subject to the defendant’s general…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoard v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Hudgins v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. ChurchillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Harvey v. ZellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Williams v. BallengerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Maloy v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Johnson v. RooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Nail v. HiersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Allstate Insurance Company v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.