Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Schnurstein

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1956No. 19396PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almand, Justice.

The Court of Appeals has certified to this court for answer the following question:

“1. Where, as the result of a single tortious act committed by the defendant, the plaintiff suffers personal injury and also-property damage to her automobile, and where thereafter the parties enter into a settlement agreement as to the' amount of property damage only, will such a settlement thereafter bar the right of the plaintiff to maintain and prosecute an action at law for the recovery of damages for injury to her person, where the foregoing property settlement appeal’s pleaded according…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. EndsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Giles v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Dearden v. HeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Macon Railway & Light Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Krasner v. O'DELLCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Phillips v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Glover v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  3. Allstate Insurance Company v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1981
  5. Lowance v. DempseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API