Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARK

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 5, 1952PublishedCited by 182 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The appeal concerns the propriety of the action taken by the local board of adjustment refusing plaintiffs leave to use their lands at the northeast corner of Lyons Avenue and Clinton Place, Newark, for the operation of a gasoline service station. The ruling was sustained by the Superior Court on a review in lieu of the prerogative writ of certiorari.

Proceeding on the hypothesis that “gasoline or oil stations, automobile filling and cleaning stations and public garages, while necessary, may be inimical to the public safety and general welfare…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. Johnston-Willis, Ltd. v. KenleyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  2. TAXPAYERS ASSN. OF WEYMOUTH TP. INC. v. Weymouth Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. López Salas v. Junta de PlanificaciónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
  4. Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API