Legal Opinion

Lockard v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1949No. L. A. 20383PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This is an appeal by the city of Los Angeles from a judgment declaring certain provisions of a comprehensive zoning ordinance invalid and void insofar as it affects the use of a strip of property twelve blocks long within which plaintiffs’ property is situated.

The zoning scheme of defendant city adopted in June, 1946, classifies the city into 16 types of districts as follows: Two agricultural districts; one suburban district; five residential districts, zoned R-l through R-5 starting with the *456most highly restricted one-family residential areas through various grades of multiple dwellings;…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Big Creek Lumber Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API