Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Jester
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided September 28, 1928PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.
The trial court refused to hear testimony offered by plaintiffs in support of the allegations of their petition for writ of certiorari, giving as his reason that he found no illegality appearing upon the face of the return, and on the return had no doubt as to the legality of the action of the board. Our view of the question of the correctness of this ruling is determinative of the appeal.
The ruling demands inquiry as to the method and scope of review by the trial court permitted by the legislative enactment (Code of 1927, Section 6466 et seq.,) granting to any person aggrieved by the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Miller v. SchoeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Carter v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
- Keller v. City of Council Bluffs, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- People Ex Rel. St. Albans-Springfield Corp. v. ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Nelson v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.