Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 11, 1996No. C94-05-32970; CA A86162PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(3), after a court trial on stipulated facts. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence that was obtained at the time of his arrest. We affirm.

On the evening of April 14,1994, Portland police officer Stradley was patrolling an area of northeast Portland in a marked police car. As Stradley approached the intersection of Northeast 8th Street and Roselawn Street, where he knew narcotics transactions frequently occurred, three people “took off running” as soon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. DahlOregon Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RickardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. CockeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. MiglavsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. City of Portland v. WeigelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. KeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API