Legal Opinion

State v. Miglavs

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 19, 2003No. C000009CR, C000111CR A111137 (Control), A111138PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*422LINDER, J.

In this consolidated appeal, defendant challenges four convictions of unlawful possession of a firearm. ORS 166.250. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained after police conducted a patdown search of him for officer safety reasons and discovered a handgun concealed in his waistband. Defendant also assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized several months later when, relying in part on information discovered in the earlier officer safety search, police obtained a warrant to search defendant and his apartment.1 We affirm.

On…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. HerbertOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. GoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MiglavsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. ZumbrumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. CazeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API