Legal Opinion
State v. Cocke
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 23, 1999No. C9604-33280; CA A96903PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*181WOLLHEEM, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for the manufacture, delivery, and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992; ORS 475.999. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. We review for errors of law and affirm.
Portland probation officers called for police back up at a Portland home after discovering one of their probationers, Quaschnick, in the possession of marijuana and an assault-style knife. Quaschnick was found in the living room area of his home with two to three other individuals.1 All were asked to step out of the house onto the porch.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- New York v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ZumbrumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. CockeOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CramptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. HiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.