State v. Dahl
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*201UNIS, J.
The questions in this case are (1) whether a “seizure” of a person occurs under either Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution1 or the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States2 when law enforcement officers order a person to come out of his house with his hands up and the person to whom the order is directed complies with that order and, (2) if so, whether, in the light of the circumstances of this case, a seizure of that kind was unlawful. We answer those questions in the affirmative. We therefore reverse the contrary decision of the Court of Appeals, vacate…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. FairOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. Vasquez-VillagomezOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.