Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Weigel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 3, 2016No. 131053039; A155958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

Defendant conditionally pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a loaded firearm in public, in violation of Portland City Code (PCC) 14A.60.010, reserving a right to appeal the trial court’s denials of his demurrer and his motion to suppress evidence that the gun seized from defendant was loaded. On appeal, he assigns error to both rulings. We reject defendant’s challenge to the denial of his demurrer without written discussion. As to the motion to suppress, defendant argues that the trial court erred when it concluded that Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, permitted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. RickardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State v. RegnierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. HarrymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. KeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API