Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Warden
California Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1912No. L.A. No. 2901PublishedCited by 6 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff sued to enforce specific performance of a contract for the conveyance of real property. Defendants appeal from a judgment against them on the ground that it is not supported by the evidence, and they appeal generally from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The contract was signed by plaintiff and by Julia P. Warden. Defendant C. D. Warden is sued as the husband of the latter. By the terms of the instrument Julia P. Warden agreed, upon full payment of the purchase price of the property described therein, to convey it by a good and sufficient deed of grant, to L. Agnes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Niles v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Wait v. Kern River Mining, Milling, & Developing Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Fritz v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Sunrise Land Co. v. RootCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Joyce v. TomasiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Sullivan v. BurcawIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Cushing v. LeviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Butte Creek Consol. Dredging Co. v. OlneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Bodem v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.