Wait v. Kern River Mining, Milling, & Developing Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This action was brought to obtain a decree that plaintiff is the owner of two hundred and forty-five thousand shares of stock of the defendant corporation, and that the defendants have and hold the same in trust for the use and benefit of plaintiff, and requiring said corporation to issue to plaintiff said two hundred and forty-five thousand shares. Defendant Latham having prior to the institution of the action absconded and left the state of California and his whereabouts being absolutely unknown, the only service of summons had upon him was by publication. He did not appear in the action.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Heidritter v. Elizabeth Oil-Cloth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Boswell's Lessee v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Young v. South Tredegar Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1886
- Stiles v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Atkinson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Holmes v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Hobbs v. Tom Reed Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Backus v. FinkelsteinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1927
- Joyce v. TomasiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.