Bodem v. Friedman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment refusing to quiet her title to a parcel of real property. On November 1, 1940, plaintiff and appellant, Gertrude Bodem, and her husband entered into a written contract with defendants and respondents Friedman and Hays for the sale of the real property to respondents for $5,132. Two hundred and eighty-two dollars was paid on the execution of the contract and the balance was provided to be paid in monthly instalments of $40 per month until the balance including interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum on decreasing balances had been paid in full. Time was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Hayt v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Hunt v. MahoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Marshall v. HiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Leiter v. EltingeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Thomsen v. GlennNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956