Legal Opinion

Breza v. Don Farr Moving & Storage Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 2003PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

ORIE MELVIN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Don Farr Moving & Storage Company, (Don Farr) appeals from the judgment entered against it following the denial of post-trial motions. On appeal, Don Farr claims his failure to appear for the arbitration hearing was due to a lack of notice. Therefore, Don Farr claims it was denied its right to due process and is entitled to a trial de novo. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

¶ 2 The facts and procedural history may be summarized as follows. This action arises out of a civil dispute between Appellee Michael Breza (Breza) and Don Farr. Breza alleged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Samaras v. HartwickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Donegal Mutual Insurance v. Insurance DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Roman Mosaic & Tile Co. v. Thomas P. Carney, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Jamison v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jones v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. One 1991 Cadillac SevilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Szymanski v. DoteySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. SalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Angle, R. v. Smith, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API