Breza v. Don Farr Moving & Storage Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
ORIE MELVIN, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant, Don Farr Moving & Storage Company, (Don Farr) appeals from the judgment entered against it following the denial of post-trial motions. On appeal, Don Farr claims his failure to appear for the arbitration hearing was due to a lack of notice. Therefore, Don Farr claims it was denied its right to due process and is entitled to a trial de novo. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
¶ 2 The facts and procedural history may be summarized as follows. This action arises out of a civil dispute between Appellee Michael Breza (Breza) and Don Farr. Breza alleged…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Samaras v. HartwickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Donegal Mutual Insurance v. Insurance DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Roman Mosaic & Tile Co. v. Thomas P. Carney, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Jamison v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jones v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. One 1991 Cadillac SevilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Szymanski v. DoteySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. SalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Angle, R. v. Smith, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.