Legal Opinion

Roman Mosaic & Tile Co. v. Thomas P. Carney, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1999PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 Before this Court are the direct appeals of Thomas P. Carney, Inc. (“Carney”) and Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”) and the cross-appeal of Roman Mosaic and Tile Company (“Roman”). After a hearing without a jury on the merits of Roman’s complaint, the trial court found in favor of Roman and against Carney and Continental in the amount of $611,763.22, plus interest and costs. We affirm.

¶ 2 On May 11, 1992, Carney was retained as the general contractor by the City of Philadelphia to renovate numerous terminals at the Philadelphia International Airport. Continental…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Allegheny County v. MonzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Halpin v. LaSalle UniversitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Reliance Universal, Inc. v. Ernest Renda Contracting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Century Indemnity Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Skurnowicz v. LucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Kaiser v. Old Republic InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Hirsch v. EPL Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Breza v. Don Farr Moving & Storage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API