Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Salter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Michael Salter appeals the judgment of sentence imposed following his conviction for failure to verify his residence with the Pennsylvania State Police as required by the verification provision of Megan’s Law, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9796. Salter asserts that the Commonwealth did not introduce sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he actually received the notice as required to sustain his conviction, and that the trial court erred in applying the “mailbox rule” to extrapolate receipt from evidence that the notice was sent. We conclude that the trial court’s reliance on the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. KarkariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Com. v. Stevenson, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Com. v. Thomas, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Com. v. Tiburcio, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API