Legal Opinion

Jones v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 2004PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPopovich, J.

¶ 1 Kim Jones (Wife) and Bruce Jones (Husband) (collectively Appellants) appeal from the judgment entered in favor of Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Prudential) on December 12, 2002, in the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County. Upon review, we affirm.

¶ 2 The relevant facts and procedural history of this case are as follows: On May 20, 1999, Appellants commenced a declaratory judgment action against Prudential as a result of Prudential’s rejection of Appellants’ claim for underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits following an August 16, 1998 motor vehicle accident…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tyler v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. PinkertonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Line Lexington Lumber & Millwork Co. v. Pennsylvania Publishing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. O'BRIEN v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Hall v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Voracek v. Crown Castle USA Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Crystal Lake Camps v. AlfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Geise v. Nationwide Life & Annuity Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Affordable Outdoor, LLC v. Tri-Outdoor, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Suber v. Pennsylvania Commission on Crime & DelinquencyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API