Legal Opinion

Samaras v. Hartwick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1997PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge.

On March 1, 1985, Christine and John Samaras commenced the instant personal injury action against Martha and John Hart-wick by filing a writ of summons in the Bucks County Court of Common Pleas. For the next year, the case proceeded through the usual pre-trial procedures, and, on May 26, 1986, was scheduled for trial. On that date, the Samarases requested a continuance. The Hartwicks were opposed to continuing the case and, therefore, objected. After hearing argument on the matter, the Honor*72able Judge George Kelton granted the requested continuance.

Due to docket activity…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. GrasseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Metz Contracting, Inc. v. Riverwood Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Sheehan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Clinger v. TilleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Chartiers Industrial & Commercial Development Authority v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Environmental Equipment & Service Co. v. Wachovia BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Donegal Mutual Insurance v. Insurance DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Breza v. Don Farr Moving & Storage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Tucker v. Ellwood Quality Steels Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API