Szymanski v. Dotey
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
FITZGERALD, J.:
Appellant, David G. Szymanski, appeals pro se from the judgment entered in the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, following the denial of his post-trial motion. He challenges the trial court’s decision not to grant him a new trial after entering judgment in favor of Appellees, Robert Dotey and Sherry Jenkins, following his failure to appear. We hold that under the unique facts of this case, a presumption of receipt of the notice scheduling trial is not established when a party seeking to invoke the mailbox rule has failed to demonstrate a presumption of mailing of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ecksel v. Orleans Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Meierdierck v. MILLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Mastroni-Mucker v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Estate of BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- C.E. v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- C.E. v. DPWCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Com. v. Paul, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Estate of Gregg A. SchwotzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Kennedy, S. v. K&J ConstructionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.