Legal Opinion

Alligood v. Procter & Gamble Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1991No. C-890765PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Per curiam

On May 1, 1989, two groups of plaintiffs filed separate complaints against defendant-appellee, the Procter & Gamble Company (“P & G”), alleging breach of contract arising from a catalog promotion advertised on boxes of Pampers diapers. The plaintiffs-appellants sought class-action certification and representation, which was granted on June 27, 1989.

On June 16 and June 29, 1989, P & G filed motions to dismiss, requesting that they be treated as motions for summary judgment. Following oral argument, the court of common pleas granted summary judgment to P & G on October 30, 1989.

P & G began the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hounshell v. American States InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Noroski v. FalletOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Litsinger Sign Co. v. American Sign Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Mr. Mark Corp. v. Rush, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Nilavar v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Needham v. the Provident BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Amanda Sateriale v. R J Reynolds Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. McSweeney v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Nilavar v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API