Legal Opinion
Amanda Sateriale v. R J Reynolds Tobacco Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 13, 2012No. 11-55057PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed July 13, 2012, and reported at 687 F.3d 1132, is amended as follows:
At slip opinion page 8097, 687 F.3d at 1143, after the sentence <The presence of discretion thus does not preclude the existence of an offer. >, insert the following new footnote:
<In its petition for rehearing, RJR argues that the plaintiffs have asserted only a bilateral contract and not a unilateral contract. There is no question, however, that the plaintiffs — in their complaint, as well as in the district court and on appeal — have consistently alleged acceptance by performance, which is the essence…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Olson v. Major League BaseballCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Clancy v. Bromley Tea Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Edward Zadrozny v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Hyun Ju Park v. City of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.