Legal Opinion

Van Horn v. O'Connor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1906No. 5849PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lincoln county, Warren, J., entered June 3, 1905, upon granting a nonsuit in an action to- recover damages for the fraud of a vendor in the sale of lands.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

— This action was brought by appellants, to recover damages from respondents on account of alleged false and fraudulent representations in regard to- the sale of certain real estates These representations are alleged to have been made by respondents O’Connor and Leei, and relied upon by appellants. Hpon issues of fact made by the pleadings, the cause came on for trial toi the court and a jury. After the plaintiff F. M. Van Horn had given his testimony, the trial court took the case from the jury, upon motion of the respondents. This appeal is from the judgment of dismissal.

*514Mr. Van Horn’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lawson v. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hanson v. TompkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Sears v. StinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Daniel v. GliddenWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Hulet v. AcheyWashington Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nelson v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. Best v. OffieldWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Conta v. CorgiatWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Como Orchard Land Co. v. MarkhamMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Wilson v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API