Legal Opinion

People v. Margelis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1922No. Docket No. 171PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to recorder’s court of Detroit; Marsh (Pliny W.) J. John Margelis was convicted of violating the liquor law.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Defendant was charged with and convicted of having had unlawfully in his possession one half pint of whisky, and he has appealed. Defendant by motion timely made sought return of the whisky as having been unlawfully obtained and was refused. He was not charged with the possession of other intoxicating liquor. Due objection to the use of the whisky in evidence was made.

Police officers, in plain clothes as we infer, visited a near beer saloon of one Decker in Detroit. They had no warrant for arrest or for search. One officer entered the saloon, the others remaining without, and said to Decker…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Youman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. People v. HalvekszMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hubbard v. GarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. People v. WoodwardMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. People v. Le VasseurMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People v. DavidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. NabersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. MargolisMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. People v. De CesareMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API