Commercial Exchange Bank v. McLeod
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Worth District Ooxirt. This is an action to discharge two watches' and certain money from an attachment which was levied thereon at the suit of the plaintiff against the defendant. A hearing was had upon affidavits, and the motion was sustained, and the watches and money were ordered to be discharged from the attachment. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Rothrock, Ch. J.
^ENT't'of" taren from person oí prisoner: offito retain1*1 property. On the thirty-first day of January, 1883, the plaintiff’ commenced an action against the defendant and others upon a promissory note. It was alleged in the petition that defendants had disposed of their property in part with intent to defraud their creditors, and a writ of attachment was Prayed for and issued, which was placed in the hands of the sheriff for service. The plaintiff is a partnership, and H. P. Kirie and I. R. Kirk are the individual members thereof. On the twenty-eighth day of August, 1883,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reifsnyder v. LeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Pomroy & Co. v. ParmleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
3Cited by26 opinions
- Youman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- State v. HeightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- State v. TonnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Ex parte HurnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Newberry v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.