In re Loiseleur
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
O’Connell, Judge,
delivered tlie opinion of the court:
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in his final rejection of the two claims in appellant’s application for a patent on the ground that their allowance would result in double patenting in view of the two patented claims in appellant’s prior patent hTo. 2,278,722 issued on April 7,1942, on an application, Serial No. 127,285, filed February 23, 1937.
The above-named patent and the application here involved describe two methods for forming a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re ChristmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- In re WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- In re BrogdenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Winkelmann v. CalvertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
3Cited by7 opinions
- The Weatherhead Company and Paul D. Wurzburger v. Drillmaster Supply Company and James E. Rutledge and Kenneth C. HornCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- In re FreemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- In the Matter of the Application of Sylvan O. GreenleeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- In re DollCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Electrolux Corp. v. Dustpak Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.