Legal Opinion
Electrolux Corp. v. Dustpak Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 25, 1963No. 60 C 608PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, District Judge.
In this suit for infringement of two patents relating to the construction of disposable paper filter bags for use, primarily, in vacuum cleaners of the horizontal cylinder type it has been concluded that the older patent is invalid for want of patentable novelty and that the more recent patent is invalid as embracing nothing not described and claimed in the earlier patent. Findings and conclusions have been made separately.
*368The earlier patent, No. 2,621,757, issued December 16, 1952 on Anderson’s application filed November 28, 1946, related to a disposable paper filter…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. RM Hollingshead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Bassick Manufacturing Co. v. R. M. Hollingshead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Faulkner v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Electrolux Corp. v. Dustpak, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Electrolux Corporation v. Dustpak, Ltd., Inc., and Anschel WolfCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964