Legal Opinion

In re Doll

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 28, 1949No. 5588PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all the claims, Nos. 6, 8, 9, and 10, in appellant’s application for a patent for alleged new and useful improvements in “Well Logging Method and Apparatus.”

Claim 10 is representative of the appealed claims. It reads—

10. Apparatus for investigating earth formations traversed by a bore hole comprising a plurality of spaced apart electrodes movable simultaneously along the bore hole, means for supplying electrical energy to a ground point and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  2. In re JenningsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  3. In re LoiseleurCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  4. In re KorpiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Application of BorcherdtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. In re WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. Application of Richard A. Ward and Robert C. SwitzerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. Application of McCarnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API