Legal Opinion

In re Ward

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 3, 1945No. 5040PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Presiding Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States' Patent Office affirming the decision of the examiner finally rejecting two claims, numbered 18 and 19, of appellant’s application, serial No. 342,910, for patent captioned “for Recovery of Valuable Hydrocarbons,” filed June 28, 1940. Several claims stand allowed.

Those on appeal were rejected as being unpatentable over the claims of a patent No. 2,211,088, issued to appellant August 13,1940, upon an application, serial Ho. 170,508, filed October 22,1937, no other reference being cited. The application under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Traitel Marble Co. v. U. T. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. In Re ChristmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Application of Christian Zickendraht and Arthur BuehlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. In re WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. In re JenningsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  4. In re LoiseleurCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  5. Application of Richard A. Ward and Robert C. SwitzerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API